The Fall Of Western Man Essay Research free essay sample

The Fall Of Western Man Essay, Research Paper The Fall of Western Civilization A new revolution is required # 8211 ; a Western revolution. The values of Western civilisation are lost, it # 8217 ; s ethical motives murdered and it # 8217 ; s society turned rancid. Something has changed. Currently, adult male is absorbing empty, worthless stuff. This thought of # 8220 ; pop civilization # 8221 ; has been injected into the Western adult male. His values and ethical motives have depreciated greatly. He has entered a black hole filled with expendable sums of debris. In it, he is so badly sedated with eternal sums of indoctrination that a transmutation is extremely unlikely. Indeed, Western society is in problem. But why has is turned into an useless trashcan? Why are the outlooks of these persons so distorted, so immoral, so depraved? Prior to 1900, world was at the clemency of a moral order. There was grounds of a moral jussive mood. So why is there such a drastic alteration in society within a century of clip? The reply is God. God has non changed us with his power ; instead we have changed ourselves with the deficiency of religion for Him. Religion was the base construction in the support of humanity. Many pieces of thoughts refering criterions, principals, values and ideals were mended into many consistent pieces of art because of the religion in God. Society acted as though their every word, every determination and every move reflected their opportunity for redemption. They had a end, an aspiration, excessively prove to God that they were ethical. Surely, there was a moral jussive mood. However, through the false premise of The Enlightenment and the Scientific and Industrial revolutions, something has changed. The premise of The Enlightenment was that even provincials could transform themselves into blue bloods, that given a pick, they could every bit good bask the justnesss of an ambitious morally bound society. This was proven incorrectly because non everyone wanted the pleasance of being a portion of the nobility. The Scientific Revolution changed humanity with critical innovations from Edison, Burbagge, Descartes and many other visionaries. The industrial revolution besides contributed to devolution of public-service corporation within our communities. It created a roar in population, which imposed overmastering demands on all facets of our already fighting society. I will show the critical province of Western civilization through researching three important illustrations from C.S Lewis # 8217 ; try about the Law of Human Nature, William C. Booth # 8217 ; s essay on proper essay authorship, and a Toronto Star article refering to the calamity of the Western universe. In C.S Lewis # 8217 ; essay, he presents to us his vision on the topic of morality. He states the Law of Human Nature. He uses the analogy of a # 8220 ; non-thinking # 8221 ; object ( a rock ) and a human being to compare both of them to the jurisprudence of gravity. # 8220 ; The thought was that, merely as falling rocks are governed by the jurisprudence of gravity and chemicals by chemical Torahs, so the animal called adult male besides has his law- with this great difference, that the rock couldn # 8217 ; t take whether it obeyed the jurisprudence of gravity or non, but a adult male could take either to obey the Law of Human Nature or to disobey it. # 8221 ; Lewis deems that adult male? s morality is administered by moralss # 8211 ; to cognize what is right and incorrect. Lewis so proceeds to analyze all the factors refering this Law of Human Nature. First, he explains how the Law of Human Nature used to be called the # 8220 ; jurisprudence of nature # 8221 ; . Thinkers be fore Lewis assumed that people obeyed it and was cognizant of the nature of the jurisprudence. He states, # 8220 ; They called it the jurisprudence of nature because they thought that every one knew it by nature and didn? Ts need to be taught it. Taking the race as a whole, they thought that the human thought of Decent Behavior was obvious to everyone. And I believe they were right. # 8221 ; Next, he makes clear some people think that the Law of Human Nature is unstable because different civilisations have rather different moralities. Not all work forces are rather different ; they are merely somewhat different. He grasps on the point that because every adult male knows and understands the jurisprudence, other societies engage to represent irrelevant ways of showing moralss # 8211 ; they all act somewhat different. Furthermore, he deciphers the critical facet about selfishness. # 8220 ; Selfishness has neer been admired. Work forces have differed as to whether you should hold on e married woman or four. But they have ever agreed that you mustn # 8217 ; t merely hold any adult female you liked. # 8221 ; Selflessness is what we must endeavor for to accomplish a strong sense of apt morality, yet the leftovers of the universe believe the opposite. We must non be fooled. Establishing this jurisprudence into the multitudes is about impossible. # 8220 ; None of us truly follow the Law of Nature. # 8221 ; He tells us, that about every twenty-four hours we have failed to pattern ourselves the sort of behavior we expect from other people. # 8220 ; The point is that they are one more cogent evidence of how profoundly, whether we like it or non, we believe in the Law of Human Nature. If we did non believe in nice behavior, why should we be so dying to do alibis for non holding behaved decently? The truth is, we believe in decency so much # 8211 ; we feel the Rule or Law, pressing on us so that we can # 8217 ; t bear to confront the fact that we # 8217 ; rhenium interrupting it, and accordingly we try to switch the responsibility. # 8221 ; He tries to do the point that humans know and understand the jurisprudence of nature and yet they still break it. This exemplifies how adult male understands and is knowing of these Torahs yet still acts immoral. Man is given a pick # 8211 ; yet he still heads in the incorrect way. With no religion in redemption, he does cons ider his ethical value. His rules and ethical motives are lost. In Booth # 8217 ; s try, he begins with a plaint, depicting how ill and inadequately pupils attempt to compose essays. He complains about how deadening, how meaningless and how empty they are written. He goes on about illustrations of a instructor in Indiana and how she didn # 8217 ; t care what was in the essay ( content ) , or how the essay was written ( manner ) , all she was concerned with was spelling and grammar. Wow. One does non even have to compose a narrative or a paper with content, one can compose down a few hollow sentences and every bit long as the grammar and spelling are right, a grade of one hundred per centum is awarded. That is farcical. He so moves along and states how many deadening essays he has read in his life-time. There must some kind of counterpoison to this serious job. Furthermore, he states three possible remedies: 1- # 8220 ; develop an consciousness of audience # 8221 ; 2- # 8220 ; give them something to state # 8221 ; and eventually, 3- # 8220 ; enliven their authorship personalities # 8221 ; . The pupil must hold contact with the audience. One must allow them cognize that this is valuable and is breathable cognition. Make the essay brilliant, intelligent and interesting. Following, we must give them something to state. Students bore themselves, others and governments because they have nil to state ; nil of what everybody already knows is deserving stating! At this clip and merely this clip when we have something to state, nil will tire anyone. Furthermore, Booth encourages us to compose through our ain eyes and Black Marias alternatively of through a haze of clich? . Finally, he states that good fiction will non transform pupils into good authors. Even the most elect pupil needs eternal hours and old ages of pattern with strict unfavorable judgment. Writing is an indispensable facet of reading ; reading is a critical facet of authorship. The d isplaying incompetence of the pupils essay composing accomplishments is due to the deficiency of of import cognition with small aspiration to state anything valuable, anything deserving listening to. Again, with no strong intuition to God, values have vanished. In this newspaper article, the writer is besides cognizant that something has changed. We see that there are excessively many facets of this thought of # 8220 ; pop civilization # 8221 ; taking over the heads of today # 8217 ; s persons, indoctrinating them with false values and half truths which are critical in the long route to the redemption of adult male. This is all portion of the grading procedure. As population rises, that horizontal line becomes extended to a point where the pyramid is non even a pyramid any longer. In this peculiar article, the writer efforts to follow a figure of illustrations of why people today are buried in a pile of debris. He mentions # 8220 ; quicksand # 8221 ; , # 8220 ; mickeys # 8221 ; , # 8220 ; Casablanca # 8221 ; and countless illustrations of how adult male knows the thought of the topic, yet fails to really see it or hold some background on it. In the yesteryear, pieces of other plants are being put into one solid, incorporate, consis tent work of art. Take The Bible for illustration. So many decennaries of work, organisation and dedication are being integrated into one work of art # 8211 ; the most challenging, well-written book of all clip. That is phenomenal. In add-on, Homer # 8217 ; s Iliad and Odyssey are a aggregation of Hagiographas from speechmakers refering Grecian Gods and civilization. Furthermore, Plato # 8217 ; s Republic is a aggregation of Socrates readings. All beginnings show grounds. In Western civilization, pieces of work and thoughts are being thrown around yet nil is being put together. The pieces are still pieces. Nothing magnetic or captivating has come out of Western civilization ( at least nil after 1900 ) . Indeed, something has changed. In past times, consistent pieces of art could be put together because of the people # 8217 ; s religion in God and the religion of the redemption of adult male. Prior to 1900, people believed every idea and deed had a larger purpose # 8211 ; good o r bad. From blue bloods to provincials, all were in fright of perpetrating wickedness. Valuess were really values. A moral jussive mood was evident. Soon, there are no marks of a moral jussive mood ; merely the indicant that # 8220 ; god is dead # 8221 ; . With no belief in God, the pieces are non put together ; they are merely pieces with no significance. Popular civilization is persuasive. Unfortunately, the multitudes are neck deep. Presently, in this coaction of debris, it is difficult to set up which is good and meaningful or merely field, useless trash. In shutting, the grading procedure is distributing quickly. Today # 8217 ; s civilization is a aggregation of debris. Unfortunately, this debris is our values. Proper values have diminished and are non-existent. This writer excessively, knows really good that undeniably, something has changed. In decision, we see that in all three illustrations shown above how peoples values can deprecate with no aspiration, with no belief in some kind of redemption. In all facets of human behaviour, we can soon uncover that our society focuses on debris alternatively of concentrating on the importance of moralss. The multitudes are so occupied in other pop civilization gear that they are unfamiliar and dislike patrician values. Western civilisation is falling quickly. The values that were one time imposed by household and faith are now polluted by mass media. It is surely unmistakable that both household and faith are suddenly falling apart. All these choices exemplify how with no belief in God, with no aspiration, adult male chooses to worsen. With no moral imperative even those who aim to move consistent with those values of public-service corporation, our subdued civilizations have no criterions by which they can come on. The values of Western society have unhappily depreciated.